Tuesday, March 18, 2014
Reckless Driving In Virginia Loudoun Lawyers Suspended License
Lawyer - Virginia
Reckless Driving
As per Va. Code §
46.2-852, the general rule for reckless driving is defined as, irrespective of
the maximum speeds permitted by law, any person who drives a vehicle on any
highway recklessly or at a speed or in a manner so as to endanger the life,
limb, or property of any person shall be guilty of reckless driving.
Below is a sample
case of reckless driving in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.
Have you been
charged with Reckless Driving in Virginia and you are wondering what the
penalty is in VA?
Are you concerned
about the consequences of being charged with Reckless Driving in Virginia?
For a lot of our
clients, a charge of Reckless Driving can result in the loss of their job,
their security clearance, etc.
Don’t risk going
to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of Reckless
Driving in Virginia.
If you have been
charged with a criminal offense of Reckless Driving in Virginia and you are wondering
what the penalty is in VA, contact our law firm for help.
We have client
meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law
firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Criminal Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
We will do our
absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of
your case. The lawyers in our law firm have the necessary experience to assist
you with this matter.
Harris v.
Commonwealth
Facts:
Defendant pled
guilty to reckless driving and driving on a suspended license, and, following a
bench trial, the Circuit court of Loudoun (Virginia) found him guilty of grand
larceny. Defendant appealed his larceny conviction.
If you are facing
a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The Virginia
Court made the following holding:
- A defendant's claim that
evidence was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment presents a mixed
question of law and fact that an appellate court reviews de novo on
appeal. In making such a determination, the appellate court gives
deference to the factual findings of the trial court, but it independently
determines whether the manner in which the evidence was obtained meets the
requirements of the Fourth Amendment. It is an appellant's burden to show
that the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress was reversible
error when considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the
Commonwealth.
- A person is
"seized" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment if, under
the circumstances presented, a reasonable person would believe he was not
free to leave the scene of an encounter with the police. No seizure occurs
under the Fourth Amendment until the defendant fully complies with a law
enforcement officer's show of authority.
We have client
meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
An attorney from
our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our
absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of
your case. The lawyers in our law firm have the necessary experience to assist
you with this matter.
Disclaimer: